Hey i got a great question.
Say your "country", which shouldnt even be considered one, was attacked by a terrorist group. Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people? Hit me back on that one "eh".
--:-- / --:--
To all these "Canadians"
3,286 Views | 77 Replies
The one thing force produces is resistance.
At 2/14/04 08:50 PM, Peter90688 wrote: Say your "country", which shouldnt even be considered one, was attacked by a terrorist group. Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people? Hit me back on that one "eh".
Now that's interesting. Since Canada doesn't have a military or much foerign influence, what would be the point of a terrorist attack? But if there was a terrorist attack, I very much think the POLICE would try to arrest the terrorists, instead of declaring martial law. But then again, why would terrorists attack Canada? Only if Canada had any influence, any status in the world, and that would only be through economic means. Of course, that would also be coupled with a military, so if terrorists attacked Canada, I think it would be very much a safe thing to say that they would have a big enough military to strike back.
So there.
I'll hit you back on that one.
Canada's armed forces employ more than 82,000 people. http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/govt16a.htm
Granted, not all of them are soldiers, but 50,000 is an understatement.
Secondly, Canada has all of NATO, as well as the UN for any necessary assistance, which is unlikely, as, unless the terrorists are mounting an invasion, all there is to do is clean up. Not declare war on the world.
Finally, why shouldn't Canada be considered a country?
Eh.
At 2/14/04 10:03 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: I'll hit you back on that one.
Canada's armed forces employ more than 82,000 people. http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/govt16a.htm
Granted, not all of them are soldiers, but 50,000 is an understatement.
Secondly, Canada has all of NATO, as well as the UN for any necessary assistance, which is unlikely, as, unless the terrorists are mounting an invasion, all there is to do is clean up. Not declare war on the world.
Finally, why shouldn't Canada be considered a country?
Eh.
Damn, you just got schooled sonny.
I don't see why so many people blindly bash Canada. Canadians are so much more peaceful than Americans are, so instead of admire their peacefulness we bash them.... It makes no sense.
At 2/14/04 10:50 PM, EefOofTheBeefBoof wrote: Canadians are so much more peaceful than Americans are,
It's not like they have any choice to be peaceful or not. It's too cold to be war mongering that far north.
The one thing force produces is resistance.
At 2/14/04 11:13 PM, theGOO wrote: It's not as cold as you may think out here. In the summer time it's far hotter in comparison to some other American states. At the moment it's like -5 degrees celcius.
Bah, I know that. Can't anyone make vast generalizations anymore?
The one thing force produces is resistance.
At 2/14/04 11:18 PM, -redskunk- wrote:At 2/14/04 11:13 PM, theGOO wrote: It's not as cold as you may think out here. In the summer time it's far hotter in comparison to some other American states. At the moment it's like -5 degrees celcius.Bah, I know that. Can't anyone make vast generalizations anymore?
You also got schooled.
At 2/14/04 08:50 PM, Peter90688 wrote: Hey i got a great question.
Say your "country", which shouldnt even be considered one, was attacked by a terrorist group. Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people? Hit me back on that one "eh".
Say my 'country' doesnt fuck with other countries becuase of thier religion. Lets say that this country wouldnt get attack by a terrorist group becuase they didnt do the before mentioned act. Lets say that our country with a weak ass military remains have a weak ass military so we wouldnt hvae to help out American when they go on a imperalist oil hunt. Hit me back on that one...or "bring it on"
At 2/14/04 10:03 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: Finally, why shouldn't Canada be considered a country?
Eh.
Zing! He scores!
At 2/14/04 08:50 PM, Peter90688 wrote: Hey i got a great question.
Say your "country", which shouldnt even be considered one, was attacked by a terrorist group. Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people? Hit me back on that one "eh".
Well, America has a HUGE fuckoff military... I can see how that helped them on 9/11.
Also, who'd want to attack canada?
At 2/15/04 10:32 AM, bumcheekcity wrote:At 2/14/04 08:50 PM, Peter90688 wrote: Hey i got a great question.Well, America has a HUGE fuckoff military... I can see how that helped them on 9/11.
Say your "country", which shouldnt even be considered one, was attacked by a terrorist group. Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people? Hit me back on that one "eh".
Also, who'd want to attack canada?
Very good point. I guess that compensating for small genitals by toting around a huge, excessive military (which, by the way, is the reason the US can't afford a decent health-care system, like CANADA) isn't the only way of carrying out foreign policy after all! Maybe diplomacy and not pissing people off in the first place is a viable option, n'est pas? And no matter how big your military is, you can't be 100% safe from suicide attacks. America will always be vulnerable, no matter what. And the sooner it realizes that, and starts being more diplomatic like Canada, the better off it will be.
Whouldn't you want your strongest ally, the americans, to help your weak ass military of less that 50,000 people?
They wouldn't need to. The whole world would be sending aid to peaceful Canada. Yay Canadians!
At 2/15/04 01:15 PM, Slizor wrote: They wouldn't need to. The whole world would be sending aid to peaceful Canada. Yay Canadians!
I'm sorry, this board is too full of irony. The next person who makes a ironic statement has to make a flash dedicated to the Politics BBS.
At 2/15/04 01:22 PM, EvilGovernmentAgent wrote:At 2/15/04 01:15 PM, Slizor wrote: They wouldn't need to. The whole world would be sending aid to peaceful Canada. Yay Canadians!I'm sorry, this board is too full of irony. The next person who makes a ironic statement has to make a flash dedicated to the Politics BBS.
Awwww, bu-bu-but, please Mr. Evil, I'm Canadian. We're a very ironic people. I mean, we are among the two nations ever to kick the U.S.'s ass in a war (Canada in 1812, and Vietnam in the 60's), and yet we don't even have a real military anymore. We call ourselves "multi"-cultural, but we only recognize French and English as official languages - in spite of the fact that First Nations people were here first! Without our ironic wit, we're nothing! (And did I mention we're very self-depricating?) And I suck at flash, so you really don't want to see what I come up with. Really.
Dumbass do you know what a terrorist is? Theyre not an evil empire that can invade countries. Sounds like your one of those people who watch cnn, duck tape your house to stop the anthrax and are a racist against any 'terrorist' minorities.
Why would a 'terrorist army' attack canada? Canada doesnt piss off the world with threats and outragous actions. Canada will last longer than the usa in the (probably) coming ww3.
Not needing an army if the best defence you can get.
At 2/15/04 01:44 PM, H-Dawg wrote: Awwww, bu-bu-but, please Mr. Evil, I'm Canadian. We're a very ironic people.
An-an-an-and so am I, Dawg.
I mean, we are among the two nations ever to kick the U.S.'s ass in a war (Canada in 1812, and Vietnam in the 60's), and yet we don't even have a real military anymore.
Excuse you, but that was the British, and only in the first few months. After that, the red coats took their own beating up the ass. Just because we burned the White House doesn't mean that ''we'' won the war. And it wasn't ''us''.
Vietnam? The Viet Cong had their ass handed to them on a silver platter, forks, knives and spoon. The only reason the U.S. pulled out was political turmoil at home (to put it mildly)
We call ourselves "multi"-cultural, but we only recognize French and English as official languages - in spite of the fact that First Nations people were here first! Without our ironic wit, we're nothing! (And did I mention we're very self-depricating?) And I suck at flash, so you really don't want to see what I come up with. Really.
You didn't make any ironic statements above.
At 2/15/04 03:44 PM, EvilGovernmentAgent wrote:
:: You didn't make any ironic statements above.
I submit, Evil, and accept my defeat. (**Sounds of slicing-flesh and strangled screams of nostral-agony as H-Dawg commits hary-cary**) You're right *gurgle*, we really didn't kick U.S. ass. (Oh, but we wanted to! And if only we could now! It'd be time for another "regime change" S of the 49th parallel!)
At 2/15/04 04:03 PM, H-Dawg wrote: I submit, Evil, and accept my defeat. (**Sounds of slicing-flesh and strangled screams of nostral-agony as H-Dawg commits hary-cary**) You're right *gurgle*, we really didn't kick U.S. ass. (Oh, but we wanted to! And if only we could now! It'd be time for another "regime change" S of the 49th parallel!)
So much for the sterotype of peaceful Canadians ardently opposed to violence and war........
At 2/15/04 04:51 PM, EvilGovernmentAgent wrote:
So much for the sterotype of peaceful Canadians ardently opposed to violence and war........
Not all Canadians are as stupid as h-dawg over here.
At 2/15/04 03:31 PM, Jimsween wrote: Ok, I've had enough listening to people talk nonsense. First of all, Canada is not immune to terrorist attacks, the fact that people in Canada are prosperous makes them in danger. If you were starving and you saw people stuffing thier face with cheeseburgers you would be angry, and naturally want to blame them for your problems.
As prosperous as... say.. the US? Face it, Canada has, like, zero enemies. People are queing up to bomb America.
At 2/15/04 04:57 PM, Matty233 wrote:At 2/15/04 04:51 PM, EvilGovernmentAgent wrote:So much for the sterotype of peaceful Canadians ardently opposed to violence and war........Not all Canadians are as stupid as h-dawg over here.
EARGHH!!!!!!!
NO!
*Smashes head against wall*
MORE!
*Smashes head against wall*
IRONIC!
*Smashes head against wall*
STATEMENTS!!
*Smashes head against wall yet again*
*Adjusts shades*
*Begins destroying all furniture in sight*
AARRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!!!
Anyone like the fact that this Peter guy got pwned and didn't make another post in his own topic?
At 2/15/04 05:35 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: Anyone for some irony?
How about this then?
At 2/14/04 11:28 PM, _Jawa_ wrote:
I speak for all the Canadians here
That is a complete lie. Canada disavows any such sentiments.
At 2/15/04 06:34 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: That is a complete lie. Canada disavows any such sentiments.
I completely second that notion.
And Proteas has been marked for No-Supper-For-A-Month punishment.
And it's funny that Peter hasn't made a single post.
And I'm hungry.
At 2/15/04 06:52 PM, EvilGovernmentAgent wrote: And Proteas has been marked for No-Supper-For-A-Month punishment.
The fuck did I ever do to you?!
At 2/15/04 07:04 PM, Proteas wrote: The fuck did I ever do to you?!
I want to avoid anymore of this "irony" madness.
Is it just me, or are things just plain dull?
