Maybe if cishet white men stop acting like a victim and hating everyone then they will have a good life.
Stop reading 400 year old books and listening to funny mustache man.
Stop using the Bible as some sort of hate guide.
Maybe if cishet white men stop acting like a victim and hating everyone then they will have a good life.
Stop reading 400 year old books and listening to funny mustache man.
Stop using the Bible as some sort of hate guide.
At 3/4/23 01:16 PM, sW1chyboi wrote:At 3/1/23 01:12 AM, ChromaCee wrote: I'm sick of seeing cishet white men be villainized simply for being cishet white men. Sure, there were most certainly shitty cishet white men throughout history, but that doesn't mean the ones of today are inherently shitty people.stupud question, whatβs a cishet?
The individual has to actually DO something to deserve to be villainized.
I'm sick of a world where everyone just makes assumptions about each other just for having certain genes, chromosomes, and neurobiology.
Cisgender Heterosexual (basically non-lgbtq)
I think we should treat everyone equally, including cishet white men
At 3/5/23 01:53 AM, BUM-DRILLER wrote: I think we should treat everyone equally, including cishet white men
I agree
At 3/5/23 01:53 AM, BUM-DRILLER wrote: I think we should treat everyone equally, including cishet white men
I don't think we should treat kiddie diddlers, thieves and jackasses the same as everyone else :x
Content of their character and all that.
At 3/5/23 09:37 AM, someaveragechap wrote:At 3/5/23 01:53 AM, BUM-DRILLER wrote: I think we should treat everyone equally, including cishet white menI don't think we should treat kiddie diddlers, thieves and jackasses the same as everyone else :x
Content of their character and all that.
That's true too. But fortunately that isn't the vast majority of the human race.
At 3/5/23 09:39 AM, ChromaCee wrote:
That's true too. But fortunately that isn't the vast majority of the human race.
Only takes one person to ruin a whole bunch of peoples day. I hope you have a good one!
At 3/5/23 09:40 AM, someaveragechap wrote:At 3/5/23 09:39 AM, ChromaCee wrote:Only takes one person to ruin a whole bunch of peoples day. I hope you have a good one!
That's true too. But fortunately that isn't the vast majority of the human race.
Sadly, that is true as well.
Hi :)
At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
I just have two categories at this point to simplify things:
1: Humans (any individual that lives their harmless life in peace)
2: Trash (any individual that chooses to remain in ignorance even though it is within their control to change for the better)
At 3/7/23 07:45 PM, Jojo wrote:At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).I just have two categories at this point to simplify things:
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
1: Humans (any individual that lives their harmless life in peace)
2: Trash (any individual that chooses to remain in ignorance even though it is within their control to change for the better)
So, witch category do I fall in?
At 3/7/23 08:18 PM, EdyKel wrote:At 3/7/23 07:45 PM, Jojo wrote:So, witch category do I fall in?At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).I just have two categories at this point to simplify things:
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
1: Humans (any individual that lives their harmless life in peace)
2: Trash (any individual that chooses to remain in ignorance even though it is within their control to change for the better)
Well, you seem to be against unnecessary hate, so 1.
unbelievable how meaningless this all is when you put your phone down and stop acting like itβs real life.
At 3/2/23 01:12 PM, Seth wrote:Thing is, if you need to actively go searching out for reasons to believe you're the victim of systemic racism, you're probably not the victim of systemic racism. People of colour don't need to be shown redpill-style videos about how they're victims of racism, they already know it lmaoYou can't deny that it doesn't exist.
You can't deny that it's being unjustly justified.
You can't deny that it's wrong.
Having to go out of your way to search for it or not, the fact that there are so many videos of people "speaking out" is a sign that it's happening, and it's a hypocritical double-standard that should be addressed rather than dismissed as something that one finds when looking for drama.
And wtf are you on about? Dude didn't say systemic racism.
Thank you for your honest and thoughtful comment
Here is an example of systemic anti-white racism, right on the front page of the LA Times. The author (race-baiting instigator) claims that driving a car is... yup racism by white people.
At 3/10/23 04:51 PM, Tyler wrote:At 3/2/23 01:12 PM, Seth wrote:Thank you for your honest and thoughtful commentThing is, if you need to actively go searching out for reasons to believe you're the victim of systemic racism, you're probably not the victim of systemic racism. People of colour don't need to be shown redpill-style videos about how they're victims of racism, they already know it lmaoYou can't deny that it doesn't exist.
You can't deny that it's being unjustly justified.
You can't deny that it's wrong.
Having to go out of your way to search for it or not, the fact that there are so many videos of people "speaking out" is a sign that it's happening, and it's a hypocritical double-standard that should be addressed rather than dismissed as something that one finds when looking for drama.
And wtf are you on about? Dude didn't say systemic racism.
Here is an example of systemic anti-white racism, right on the front page of the LA Times. The author (race-baiting instigator) claims that driving a car is... yup racism by white people.
At 3/10/23 05:14 PM, EdyKel wrote: Did you read the article?
βCourse he didnβt, and I suspect the author counts on it.
Half the clicks on that article are like social media users like Tyler seething at the headline.
At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
Dude, I had to look it up too
At 3/2/23 12:00 AM, Gimmick wrote:At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).Think of it like the modern WASP.
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
WTF is a WASP?
At 3/1/23 01:12 AM, ChromaCee wrote: I'm sick of seeing cishet white men be villainized simply for being cishet white men. Sure, there were most certainly shitty cishet white men throughout history, but that doesn't mean the ones of today are inherently shitty people.
The individual has to actually DO something to deserve to be villainized.
I'm sick of a world where everyone just makes assumptions about each other just for having certain genes, chromosomes, and neurobiology.
Well that's where the media plays its role. In the west, people (out of a stupid assumption) assume that western (European & American) history is the only history, and a second assumption is that there is only one version to history. There were all kinds of evil and good people throughout history of different regions, races, genders, religions, sexuality, etc. Evil and good have nothing to do with race or gender, and has all to do with an individual's actions (there are no good groups). The problem is that evil and good are relative to some people who's personal interest is above all.
At 3/15/23 02:31 AM, decampo wrote:At 3/2/23 12:00 AM, Gimmick wrote:WTF is a WASP?At 3/1/23 10:54 PM, EdyKel wrote: Honestly, I had to look up what cishet meant. I knew what CIS was, only because some poster started describing himself as a SWCM (single white CISgender male).Think of it like the modern WASP.
I think all these acronyms are getting way out of control. It's getting confusing as hell for people who don't follow this stuff.
Teacher, goth, communist, cynic, alcoholic, master swordsman, king of shitpoasts.
It's better to die together than to live alone.
Sig by Decky
I don't feel particularly vilified by negative talk about cishet white men, despite being one, because I know exactly which people they're really talking about and I'm emotionally secure enough to not let the splash damage affect me.
Not everyone that passively benefits from centuries of inequality either refuses to acknowledge it or thinks that inequality is based and should continue or get worse. I know I'm not part of that, I know there's no way to tell that I'm not that way at a glance, and I know there's enough people that ARE like that that it's easier to just say "cishet white men" than "the type of cishet white man that would support the continuation of systemic inequalities that benefit them *DEEEEEP BREATH* and NOT the ones that DON'T support it despite it being in their immediate material interests to do so." Every single time.
Of all the problems I could have, not being coddled by being explicitly mentioned as the exception to the rule is kind of a nothingburger.