I actually meant for the image to be this way since it was done in a cell-shaded style. Adding contour lines to the image would have defeated the purpose of using this style since the shading is meant to take the place of inked lines through implication.

The ears are perhaps the parts of this illustration that bother me the most. >.<

Sadly this was almost exactly the way she looked in the reference photograph I used. Frightening, I know. That's also part of the reason I chose that image for reference (not just because it was one of the most recognizable and well know photos of her from the campaign). Like I said, this assignment was made difficult by how hard it was to find anything about her to promote. I found it somewhat fun to play off of that photo in how creepy it was inevitably going to turn out.

Thanks for the +8 for quality. But the overall zero for the stated reason still comes across as a bit of an insult. It's certainly not the type of review that would fly well in an academic environment either.

In regards to your other message, though insightful and well composed, it would have been much more easily accepted if not for certain sexist comments here.