At 8/27/19 03:53 PM, Mencret wrote:At 8/27/19 12:20 PM, EdyKel wrote:Son, you only had one things to do: Back up your arguments with specifics on how much worse Western nations are compared to NK (doesn't matter who you say it to). You couldn't even do that, on top of your argument about western nations having state run media, of any kind....
But what do you have to show for.... You just defended a country's atrocities because you thinks it's a good thing to do. A country ruled by a military dictatorship, with it's one party system, while it's state controlled media promotes round the clock propaganda that praises it's leaders and vilifies everything else, while the people on the bottom suffer far greater than those in any Western nation. This is just basic knowledge. And you are trying to make an absurd argument that Western countries are just as bad, if worse, while having nothing to show for.
Like I said, it doesn't matter what sort of system a country is run under. It's just that NK are more upfront in what they do.
*sigh
We are talking about current affairs, not things they that may have been done in the past, which no longer apply today.
Guess who has the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons and actually used them on civilians? The United States
Sure, and that was during WW2, after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and killed thousands of people, including civilians - not to mention what Japan did to neighboring countries, and prisoners of war (estimated, they killed 6 to 10 million civilians).
And it was not an easy decision to make, but it ended the war quickly, leading to fewer American casualties that would have been in the millions otherwise.
Guess who uses white phosphorous - a supposedly banned weapon that kills you slowly and worse than a nuke ever could? Plenty of countries
Technically, it's not a banned chemical weapon by international standards - but I agree, it should never be used, even for the rare incidents it was used for.
Guess who supports military dictatorships in South America? The United States
Yes, and it was popular policy at first, back in the 50's to early 80's, to prop up strongmen controlled governments, not just South America countries, but other foreign countries as well (like the Middle East), to fight the spread of communism, and the drug trade. It didn't work out well, and created more problems than it solved.
It doesn't change the fact that most Western Countries are actual democracies, not controlled by monarchies, or dictators. You are creating a huge false equivalency here by comparing Western countries to them. *Though, Trump seems to admire dictatorships, and seems to wants to make the US imitate them, which should be discouraged.
Guess who runs their country as an absolute monarchy? Quite a few
How many Western countries are like that today? You seem to be confusing the past with the present.
Guess who is arguably more isolated than North Korea? Eritrea
So?
I could go on and on but I want to stay on topic. You can easily look these up on wikipedia since you have no problem using it - But you choose not to and for some reason NK is the greatest boogeyman of them all.
You can speculate about how people suffer in NK more than a Western nation as if poverty doesn't exist, but for whatever reason you don't have to back that up because you can conveniently insist that it's basic knowledge/belief. Did you whip out a ruler and measure it? How do you know you haven't fallen for a different flavour of propaganda yourself?
You can tout theory and how things are *supposed* to work all you like, but it will never be the same as how it is practiced.
Son, the thing about Democracies is that you have the freedom to disagree, and change things. If you have a bad leader, or politicians, you can vote them out of power for things you think are hurting this country, it's citizens, or others. With dictatorships you can't change what is bad, at all. That is the biggest fucking difference that you go out of your way to ignore, to make your comparative argument. All countries have done shit in their history, some even recently, but Western countries can change, and move away from that shit, while dictatorships can't because they are always busy rooting out dissentt, and opposing views, to keep their power centralized.