At 12/16/18 08:34 AM, Cyberdevil wrote:
But that'd be like writing a book with no title to me. It just won't seem complete until you have one. Might require some extra effort to brainstorm a good one, but to me that's part of the process, just like any other part of the polishing you put into it. The title's what explains the art. Or clues. Or gives a glimpse. That in some way conveys the artist's intention, or theme, or reference.
I understand your point and I get what you mean, even agree to some extent, but that's just personal opinion.
The fact is most artists don't title their drawings and I don't see the point of forcing them to do so. If the title gives meaning or makes it complete it's completely unrelated, as right now artists are forced to do so, instead of being given the choice.
At 12/16/18 08:34 AM, Cyberdevil wrote:
I know Twitter and Tumblr don't work the same way, but they are more like streams aren't they? Where you don't focus so much on individual pieces but just go with the flow. More like a show of progress and inspiration than a real showcase where you can go in and study stuff in detail.
It's up to the artist to treat their twitter/tumblr the way they prefer. Some artists treat it like streams, others make a "real showcase where you can go in and study stuff in detail".
The point is artists treat and like to share their stuff in their own way, each with their own rhythm and approach. Forcing them into a specific streamline of sharing is exactly what drove lots of people off deviantart.