NaN:NaN
NaN:NaN
--:-- / --:--
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

SmokeyKong16 just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Why do mods give no reason for removal of projects?

850 Views | 11 Replies
New Topic

Would it be the end of the world? for mods to just give us a reason why our projects get un-published?


I have used this website for years, and it rarely happens to me, but whenever it does it reminds me how crappy some of it's systems are. This is literally the worst part of the site.


I was just recently checking another post from an user that had the same concern, and the replies were even to the point of saying that maybe his work was bad, but that's not the point, even if that's the case we just need to get a reason for removal. It's so frustrating to not know what to change, what was wrong, how the hell are we supposed to avoid making mistakes in the future when we don't even know what we did wrong?


At 10/2/23 11:05 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:Would it be the end of the world? for mods to just give us a reason why our projects get un-published?

I have used this website for years, and it rarely happens to me, but whenever it does it reminds me how crappy some of it's systems are. This is literally the worst part of the site.

I was just recently checking another post from an user that had the same concern, and the replies were even to the point of saying that maybe his work was bad, but that's not the point, even if that's the case we just need to get a reason for removal. It's so frustrating to not know what to change, what was wrong, how the hell are we supposed to avoid making mistakes in the future when we don't even know what we did wrong?


Usually it's this.

If a movie or game gets blammed, it was low quality.

If your uploaded content gets removed by a mod, you broke a rule.

(Go read up on the rules again)

If it was an audio upload that got removed, you either posted copyrighted music (BIG no no)

or the auto copyright detection went on the fritz.

And you can head to the dedicated forum post for that.


I haven't been here as long as you, but in my time being here, I've never had any issues with my stuff being taken down. I think most people just aren't reading the rules.


BBS Signature

At 10/2/23 11:05 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:Would it be the end of the world? for mods to just give us a reason why our projects get un-published?

I have used this website for years, and it rarely happens to me, but whenever it does it reminds me how crappy some of it's systems are. This is literally the worst part of the site.

I was just recently checking another post from an user that had the same concern, and the replies were even to the point of saying that maybe his work was bad, but that's not the point, even if that's the case we just need to get a reason for removal. It's so frustrating to not know what to change, what was wrong, how the hell are we supposed to avoid making mistakes in the future when we don't even know what we did wrong?

1) The blamming of movies and games is undertaken by the userbase, and is quality-based. Feedback is dependent on reviews prior to removal, but stuff that’s blammed is generally so bad the effort for the feedback is wasted.


2) Removal of content by a moderator is because it breaks the rules. There’s malicious stuff where it’s stolen, abusive, AI, etc. I would argue this is content where the individual submitting the content isn’t owed a reason - we don’t want this content on the website.


To a lesser degree there is a content that is accepted elsewhere, such as photography and SFM. I can see these as being owed feedback, however they should refer to the content submission guidelines as the first port of call


People can seek a response via the forums/PM, however they should be prepared to receive a response that does not go their way.


———

On a side note, the user in that other thread has had a history of projects being removed: that other thread is about a GoAnimate project that was blammed by the userbase but they re-uploaded it anyway. They were told twice that AI music wasn’t allowed.


Some people simply choose not to listen.


BBS Signature

While there isn't anything more to add to the discussion to what's already been said in this thread and the exact thread that TurkeyOnAStick is talking about. I do want to add this from a user's perspective.


If you're really that adamant to find out why your submission was removed just DM a moderator. You shouldn't expect to be owed an explanation but at the very least you aren't making a damn scene out of it when you don't need to like the other guy did.


People might not like what I'm saying there, I don't care about that. What should be said is that if you have the right tact to go about talking about why your work was removed and have some humility to learn from your mistake then why would you need to be mad about it to begin with if you're proactive about it in private instead of on the BBS?


That's just how I see it.


At 10/4/23 03:06 PM, DioShiba wrote:While there isn't anything more to add to the discussion to what's already been said in this thread and the exact thread that TurkeyOnAStick is talking about. I do want to add this from a user's perspective.

If you're really that adamant to find out why your submission was removed just DM a moderator. You shouldn't expect to be owed an explanation but at the very least you aren't making a damn scene out of it when you don't need to like the other guy did.

People might not like what I'm saying there, I don't care about that. What should be said is that if you have the right tact to go about talking about why your work was removed and have some humility to learn from your mistake then why would you need to be mad about it to begin with if you're proactive about it in private instead of on the BBS?

That's just how I see it.


But that's my main problem though, why am i not owed an explanation? by that logic i'm also not owed a decent service or anything here, but that doesn't help the quality of the website, if they just provided a simple reason i wouldn't have to waste the moderator's time with my entitled attitude looking for an answer. Everyone is happy to provide me a variety of possible explanations but nobody tells me why it is good that i am left clueless about the removal of my post.


I'm not saying i definitely didn't break any rules or that i uploaded something great, i'm just begging to get the most basic of information. I want the site to improve because i think it is a great site, this has been my only complaint in the many years i have been here.


From what i have read you can't even distinguish between your post being blammed by the community or it being unpublished by a mod. How is that helpful?



At 10/4/23 08:43 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:
But that's my main problem though, why am i not owed an explanation?


There are submission guidelines in place that you can refer to before you end up submitting something. If you’re in doubt on what is allowed and what isn’t, look them up on the portal guidelines.


Ignorance to those policies aren’t an excuse to break them. Granted, if you DM an mod and you are given an explanation then you should take it as feedback.


by that logic i'm also not owed a decent service or anything here, but that doesn't help the quality of the website, if they just provided a simple reason i wouldn't have to waste the moderator's time with my entitled attitude looking for an answer. Everyone is happy to provide me a variety of possible explanations but nobody tells me why it is good that i am left clueless about the removal of my post.


How does that affect the quality of the site? If something isn’t allowed and there is clear ignorance to that then why would anyone need to explain it in the case there are repeated offenses to the submission guidelines.


If its the first time you had something taken down that might give the mods a reason to point out which guideline you broke but its another thing if you do it again and again when an explanation was given to you to begin with.


I'm not saying i definitely didn't break any rules or that i uploaded something great, i'm just begging to get the most basic of information. I want the site to improve because i think it is a great site, this has been my only complaint in the many years i have been here.

From what i have read you can't even distinguish between your post being blammed by the community or it being unpublished by a mod. How is that helpful?


And, you might be right. But blammed or unpublished its still removed at the end of the day.



At 10/4/23 09:23 PM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/4/23 08:43 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:
But that's my main problem though, why am i not owed an explanation?

There are submission guidelines in place that you can refer to before you end up submitting something. If you’re in doubt on what is allowed and what isn’t, look them up on the portal guidelines.

Ignorance to those policies aren’t an excuse to break them. Granted, if you DM an mod and you are given an explanation then you should take it as feedback.

by that logic i'm also not owed a decent service or anything here, but that doesn't help the quality of the website, if they just provided a simple reason i wouldn't have to waste the moderator's time with my entitled attitude looking for an answer. Everyone is happy to provide me a variety of possible explanations but nobody tells me why it is good that i am left clueless about the removal of my post.


How does that affect the quality of the site? If something isn’t allowed and there is clear ignorance to that then why would anyone need to explain it in the case there are repeated offenses to the submission guidelines.

If its the first time you had something taken down that might give the mods a reason to point out which guideline you broke but its another thing if you do it again and again when an explanation was given to you to begin with.

I'm not saying i definitely didn't break any rules or that i uploaded something great, i'm just begging to get the most basic of information. I want the site to improve because i think it is a great site, this has been my only complaint in the many years i have been here.

From what i have read you can't even distinguish between your post being blammed by the community or it being unpublished by a mod. How is that helpful?


And, you might be right. But blammed or unpublished its still removed at the end of the day.


I had read the rules, i've had something unpublished only twice, the first time was because i had more than one version of my game, there's still no such rule for that in the game's section and many users have different versions of their games, so i believe that not knowing the rules is a good excuse if the rules are nowhere to be seen. The moment it was unpublished I was given no reason, i had to create a topic like this, then someone "summoned" a mod to give me the excuse i just told you.


So that's why i think they should provide reasons, because moderators are not perfect, and rules can be vague, you might not believe this affects the quality of the site. You might believe creators on youtube being demonetized for no reason to not be detrimental to youtube's quality, but the creators disagree, and they do complaint about it and come together instead of blaming other creators for "not knowing" the rules.



At 10/4/23 09:58 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:
At 10/4/23 09:23 PM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/4/23 08:43 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:
But that's my main problem though, why am i not owed an explanation?

There are submission guidelines in place that you can refer to before you end up submitting something. If you’re in doubt on what is allowed and what isn’t, look them up on the portal guidelines.

Ignorance to those policies aren’t an excuse to break them. Granted, if you DM an mod and you are given an explanation then you should take it as feedback.

by that logic i'm also not owed a decent service or anything here, but that doesn't help the quality of the website, if they just provided a simple reason i wouldn't have to waste the moderator's time with my entitled attitude looking for an answer. Everyone is happy to provide me a variety of possible explanations but nobody tells me why it is good that i am left clueless about the removal of my post.


How does that affect the quality of the site? If something isn’t allowed and there is clear ignorance to that then why would anyone need to explain it in the case there are repeated offenses to the submission guidelines.

If its the first time you had something taken down that might give the mods a reason to point out which guideline you broke but its another thing if you do it again and again when an explanation was given to you to begin with.

I'm not saying i definitely didn't break any rules or that i uploaded something great, i'm just begging to get the most basic of information. I want the site to improve because i think it is a great site, this has been my only complaint in the many years i have been here.

From what i have read you can't even distinguish between your post being blammed by the community or it being unpublished by a mod. How is that helpful?


And, you might be right. But blammed or unpublished its still removed at the end of the day.

I had read the rules, i've had something unpublished only twice, the first time was because i had more than one version of my game, there's still no such rule for that in the game's section and many users have different versions of their games, so i believe that not knowing the rules is a good excuse if the rules are nowhere to be seen. The moment it was unpublished I was given no reason, i had to create a topic like this, then someone "summoned" a mod to give me the excuse i just told you.

So that's why i think they should provide reasons, because moderators are not perfect, and rules can be vague, you might not believe this affects the quality of the site. You might believe creators on youtube being demonetized for no reason to not be detrimental to youtube's quality, but the creators disagree, and they do complaint about it and come together instead of blaming other creators for "not knowing" the rules.


The rules and guidelines are available and ready at your disposal.


This shouldn't be an issue if you know where to look.


I'm also going to add this in a separate comment because I feel that it's appropriate given the circumstances.


The main problem I see that you have, the other guy that posted the same topic you have and several other users who have run into this issue on Newgrounds and several other communities do not take the time to lurk around the site to make the effort to understand how it's run and why the culture around here simply is.


This is an inherent fault with some users who don't take the time to know the community they are in and simply think that it's all about posting content when you ought to see what other people are doing, how they are going about creating content, and what happens when they do not do that much to help get their content to the necessary quality, and then you inadvertently break the rules that you neglected to read over somehow demand an explanation publicly when you should be handling things in private with the staff. (<- See that? this is the answer you have been given by everyone in this thread and you ignore it by asking the same question repeatedly and justifying why you feel differently)


Newgrounds is not a platform like Youtube where you're given an explanation when, it could end up being a bullshit explanation to why something was removed and your sole focus is to only upload content and not make the effort to know the people who are using the site at the bear minimum from the users all the way up to the staff.


You're more than welcome to talk to the staff about why your content was removed. You may get the reasons why, you may not. I'm not saying that you won't get them, you just shouldn't expect it. But there is no point in bringing up this issue for everyone to see. Hence, why you aren't owed an explanation.


Everyone has intelligence, including you. But if you aren't going to use it and expect us to hold your hand and not act independent accordingly, then why should we bend over? That wouldn't be fair to anyone else when we are doing what we can to better people in that regard. Otherwise, how in the fuck does that help anyone who genuinely want to grow?


We're a small community compared to Youtube with our own niche. And for what its worth the formula in how the rules and norms on this site have been successful to say the least even when the times have changed and the core format of the site has very rarely changed and when it has it still stuck with things such as the BBS and portals themselves.


That's something you should take into consideration, not just for Newgrounds, but anywhere you go.


At 10/4/23 09:23 PM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/4/23 08:43 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:From what i have read you can't even distinguish between your post being blammed by the community or it being unpublished by a mod. How is that helpful?

And, you might be right. But blammed or unpublished its still removed at the end of the day.


He's wrong. Only blammed submissions get obituaries, mod-removed submissions simply lead to error pages.


For what it's worth, your longer post deserves this:

iu_1092557_2278460.jpg


At 10/4/23 10:31 PM, DioShiba wrote:I'm also going to add this in a separate comment because I feel that it's appropriate given the circumstances.

The main problem I see that you have, the other guy that posted the same topic you have and several other users who have run into this issue on Newgrounds and several other communities do not take the time to lurk around the site to make the effort to understand how it's run and why the culture around here simply is.

This is an inherent fault with some users who don't take the time to know the community they are in and simply think that it's all about posting content when you ought to see what other people are doing, how they are going about creating content, and what happens when they do not do that much to help get their content to the necessary quality, and then you inadvertently break the rules that you neglected to read over somehow demand an explanation publicly when you should be handling things in private with the staff. (<- See that? this is the answer you have been given by everyone in this thread and you ignore it by asking the same question repeatedly and justifying why you feel differently)

Newgrounds is not a platform like Youtube where you're given an explanation when, it could end up being a bullshit explanation to why something was removed and your sole focus is to only upload content and not make the effort to know the people who are using the site at the bear minimum from the users all the way up to the staff.

You're more than welcome to talk to the staff about why your content was removed. You may get the reasons why, you may not. I'm not saying that you won't get them, you just shouldn't expect it. But there is no point in bringing up this issue for everyone to see. Hence, why you aren't owed an explanation.

Everyone has intelligence, including you. But if you aren't going to use it and expect us to hold your hand and not act independent accordingly, then why should we bend over? That wouldn't be fair to anyone else when we are doing what we can to better people in that regard. Otherwise, how in the fuck does that help anyone who genuinely want to grow?

We're a small community compared to Youtube with our own niche. And for what its worth the formula in how the rules and norms on this site have been successful to say the least even when the times have changed and the core format of the site has very rarely changed and when it has it still stuck with things such as the BBS and portals themselves.

That's something you should take into consideration, not just for Newgrounds, but anywhere you go.


Hey, I'm new here & I don't see any rules about us HAVING to immerse ourselves in the social culture here (though of course we should cooperate, critique constructively, contribute by scouting when able to, etc). And a community IS made up of its members. Which is why it's important for members to have a say in said community, is it not?


So why's everyone dogpiling against this, instead of taking this feedback as the perfectly reasonable suggestion it pretty much is?


Why should anyone, old or new here, bend over backwards to accept a convoluted, vague system that's overcomplicated just because "that's the way it is here"? Why can't the way things are here ever be allowed to improve? Is that seriously what I'm to expect here? :/


Sure, now maybe you're thinking "You're an outsider, you haven't been assimilated into the collective yet, so what do you know? We've been here a long time, so we know better!"


But... Why CAN'T there just be a little form box or something so that, whenever someone with authority removes someone else's content, they fill in a "Reason:" box with a reason? Even just a little short sentence? That makes perfect sense to me, & ensures that people who really don't understand what happened can learn their lesson (or dispute it if there was clearly no such wrong).


Are those in charge worried that would empower us members too much? To be informed? So it's better to keep us in the dark? :/ Cuz that's the only explanation I can come up with.


Otherwise, why on earth would you folks REALLY think it's perfectly fine for mass numbers of people, probably hundreds a day, to have to go pick a random mod & go "Why was my thing removed?", & for the mod to have to go find who did it, ask why, then relay the message back or whatever, in a pointless back-&-forth that wastes EVERYONE'S time?


When there could just be some quick letters typed into a box, & barely anyone has to bother any mods about the results, since they can then look up the part of the rules they supposedly broke. SIMPLE!


You folks so adamantly rejecting any words DARING for this convoluted nonsense to be called into question... It's like OP dipped their toes into a super-heated, near-boiling pool & immediately go "OW! This is WAY too hot!"


And all the frogs that have been in this pool, slowly heating up over time so they don't notice, turn to look at them & say in unison, "What? It's not hot. It's fine! You need to get used to it!"


Like... do I REALLY wanna stay here & "make the effort to understand how it's run" if it means I gotta boil in the process? And expect to get yelled at if I'd suggest that the giant should stop turning up the knob? :/


🌸💮 Please be patient with me; I've got major brain fog from Fibromyalgia, ADHD, severe neck/back pain, extreme sleep irregularity, & derealization disorder. 💮🌸


version 2 of retyping this cause I'm a dummy and closed my tab.


At 10/4/23 09:58 PM, Matpneumatos wrote:I had read the rules, i've had something unpublished only twice, the first time was because i had more than one version of my game, there's still no such rule for that in the game's section and many users have different versions of their games


Realistically, you should be updating the OG file to the most recent. It's super easy to fall out of the spotlight though, so putting a new version for significant changes makes sense but you don't need to have every version up. Many people do, and then every so often the old versions are taken down either by mods or the user. You're welcome to flag things which build up, mods are human and have limited capacity to go through the back catalogue of hundreds of user submissions.


At 10/5/23 07:20 PM, ZaCloud wrote:a convoluted, vague system
Why CAN'T there just be a little form box or something so that, whenever someone with authority removes someone else's content, they fill in a "Reason:" box with a reason? Even just a little short sentence?


Your first sentence summarizes the problem. The movies/games portal came out like 20 years ago, when manual verification of everything/community votes took care of the vast majority of problems. What problems remained were sorted with community flags.


Audio and Art are a separate newer system, where community votes don't thin out problems. Scouting helps to a point.


Eventually, the intent seems to be to unify the portals into one system, which I'm sure would be less of a pain to administer from both a content/mod side and a technical side.


On the audio side at least, most of the removals come with a ban. The ban system is what sends a tailored message through M-Bot to the user by private message. Yes, ideally every removal will get a message, which either means a wider ban system or part of the portal reworks.


Are those in charge worried that would empower us members too much? To be informed? So it's better to keep us in the dark? :/ Cuz that's the only explanation I can come up with.


Reaching, but I like conspiracies.


Otherwise, why on earth would you folks REALLY think it's perfectly fine for mass numbers of people, probably hundreds a day, to have to go pick a random mod & go "Why was my thing removed?", & for the mod to have to go find who did it, ask why, then relay the message back or whatever, in a pointless back-&-forth that wastes EVERYONE'S time?


People do that anyways, moreso when they get a message because then they want to nit pick the interpretation of an intentionally broad rule. You mentioned things being vague, really if every hypothetical was listed then the rules would be 74 pages of legal jargon, and many people don't read the rules as it is.


Some level of automation has helped. M-Bot gives nastygrams, sometimes tailored sometimes vague, generally with a link to the rules. You can see the mod list (all volunteers, not all active in a given week) and the limited staff (who are also answering PM/email/discord/business stuff), and while the gold standard would be that everyone gets a custom messgage it isn't realistic. In a day, audio can see 150+ submissions, of which let's say half are automatically picked up for copyright/other rulebreaking stuff. Those get a blanket message, sometimes people have valid appeals and they move on. Once upon a time (pre moderation bot) I gave everyone custom messages, which brought me to burnout pretty quick because sometimes I want to just listen to music or play a game instead of spend 5 hours in a night typing out ban messages or letting someone know their screeching audio meets the rule of "ear damaging audio" and has been removed.


Anyways, I hear you and I'm sure others have poked in to see this as well. Going to lock this as I think what should be said has been, and this is thread 2 of the same topic, which eventually will just become individuals piling in to agree/disagree/call each other names. Locking allows for people to see the thoughts and reference it someday, please don't make thread 3 of the week to continue this topic.


Summary:

  • I don't disagree with the fundamental complaint.
  • Personal messages for everyone would be nice, not logistically feasible at this time.
  • Users with issues can contact a mod for that site section from the mods list.
  • Not hyperbole that more than half of the issues are because nobody reads the rules in the first place.
  • Yep, there will be disagreements in rule interpretation. Humans are human.
  • Maybe someday hopefully, unified portal system with better messaging.

Audio / Forum / Games & Movies Moderator. Flag stolen content, don't be a dingus.

BBS Signature