At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
If you're gonna publish a traditional art piece, scan it or make sure the lighting is even across the entire piece before you take a photo of it. Unless, it's a stylistic choice, of course.
EDIT:
In this case, I feel like something is casting a shadow, and therefore the viewer might have trouble seeing all the details in the area where the shadow is cast. :P
At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
That's a cool monster you got there
At 12/27/23 12:10 AM, CzySzy wrote:At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
If you're gonna publish a traditional art piece, scan it or make sure the lighting is even across the entire piece before you take a photo of it. Unless, it's a stylistic choice, of course.
EDIT:
In this case, I feel like something is casting a shadow, and therefore the viewer might have trouble seeing all the details in the area where the shadow is cast. :P
It's a stylistic choice, Lovecraft described these god as being "tenebrous"
At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
Cool
Toniestbook
Cool, wild and Groovy beat.
Hi Nice To Meet You I'm Yosos and I do Pixel art.
Looks like a Hollow Knight concept art, which is great!
At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
that is a really neat design, but like what CzySzy said, make sure to scan it or have even lighting before posting it. Also I think if you wanna spice it up a bit, you could do it from another angle, or have it in a more dynamic pose, cuz it does look a bit stiff as is
I'm the best for a reason.
At 12/26/23 11:44 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:
You think it looks kinda odd or it is ok?
funny bug
GRR <-- that's my signature
Pretty ironic how I draw cowboys even though I'm First nations ;)
I would date it, whatever it is. Cute. Marriage material right there.
I would name it as a "Flesh Sentry"
If you didn't name it already.
ZombieGhost
I like the drawing, but this looks like a Bad Dragon product imo. A bit phallic innit
At 12/28/23 02:35 PM, Tenebrare wrote:I would date it, whatever it is. Cute. Marriage material right there.
She's already married and her husband wouldn't too happy about you
At 12/28/23 06:22 PM, Underwhirl wrote:I like the drawing, but this looks like a Bad Dragon product imo. A bit phallic innit
You have a dirty dirty mind
I like Pizza!
At 12/27/23 12:29 AM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:It's a stylistic choice, Lovecraft described these god as being "tenebrous"
it’s better to have stylistic choices in the art itself rather than through the documentation effects of the art.
If the subject matter is supposed to be dark and shadowy, then use an ink wash, or your pencil to capture that effect and make it look intentional.
As it stands right now, it just looks like you took a photo in poor lighting conditions, rather than intentionally want the piece to be tenebrous.
At 12/29/23 12:52 PM, SourCherryJack wrote:At 12/27/23 12:29 AM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:It's a stylistic choice, Lovecraft described these god as being "tenebrous"
it’s better to have stylistic choices in the art itself rather than through the documentation effects of the art.
If the subject matter is supposed to be dark and shadowy, then use an ink wash, or your pencil to capture that effect and make it look intentional.
As it stands right now, it just looks like you took a photo in poor lighting conditions, rather than intentionally want the piece to be tenebrous.
Can you be a little more specific, I'm little bit autistic
At 12/29/23 04:40 PM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:At 12/29/23 12:52 PM, SourCherryJack wrote:At 12/27/23 12:29 AM, SporgyTheMenace wrote:It's a stylistic choice, Lovecraft described these god as being "tenebrous"
it’s better to have stylistic choices in the art itself rather than through the documentation effects of the art.
If the subject matter is supposed to be dark and shadowy, then use an ink wash, or your pencil to capture that effect and make it look intentional.
As it stands right now, it just looks like you took a photo in poor lighting conditions, rather than intentionally want the piece to be tenebrous.
Can you be a little more specific, I'm little bit autistic
Sure, you said the shadow cast over the paper was intentional for the aesthetic of the drawing - since it’s supposed to be a dark character. In most cases, you should strive to take photos as clear as possible, even if the subject matter is supposed to be dark. Otherwise it could read as sloppy and unintentional.
If you’re drawing dark subject matter use your pencils and pens to do that, not the lighting in the room you’re taking the photo in.
