Who gives a shit if it is a first try, do a good job and keep working until you do a good job then submit it. You really shouldn't put "This is my first flash so be nice" in the description, that is pretty much a definite blam.
Who gives a shit if it is a first try, do a good job and keep working until you do a good job then submit it. You really shouldn't put "This is my first flash so be nice" in the description, that is pretty much a definite blam.
At 4/21/07 02:16 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: and everyone heres the flash I made.
Its 3 seconds long, has no story line, nothing artistic and no sounds. What did you expect people to vote?
I don't know what's more astonishing: that it took Protosccat123 THREE HOURS to animate that little demo, or that he was dumbfounded to find out it was blammed. Thoughts anyone? :p
no wonder it got blammed and i dont think that took 3 hours more like 3 mins but most flashes are weeks months maybe even years to finish.
and by the way i put in my description this is my first flash and it never got blammed.
At 4/21/07 02:16 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: and everyone heres the flash I made.
Really? You wonder why THAT got banned? It's 3 seconds long, uses uber-simple motion tweens, no preloader, no AS, NOTHING.
My first animation got blammed.
Why?
Because it sucked.
I made another one. It got blammed too.
Why? Because it sucked a bit less, but wasn't good enough.
What I recommend is if you have an animation that you're not sure will survive on the Portal, then post it on the BBS first, and see what people think. Then, improve it and post it on the Portal.
At 4/21/07 03:07 PM, chubbthehippo wrote: Dude, i learned flash a few months after my 10th birfdai.
and luk at meh now.
Birfday?
lol its because it sucks.No offence but man just because its your first try dosent mean its not going to get blammed i mean thats kinda common sense right there now.
At 4/21/07 02:16 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: and everyone heres the flash I made.
that took 3 hours? what were you doing? deciding the colours for 2 hours and 55 minutes?
1. 3 hours.
2. my first submission wasnt blammed.
At 4/21/07 02:16 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: and everyone heres the flash I made.
xD are you kidding me?! I'm going to piss myself. I'm still working on my first... it's been a week.
Firsts are only blammed when:
1. You say that they are your first in the description
2. It really isn't good.
Newgrounds doesn't really care that it's your 1st or your 15th- just how good it is. And yours needs work. Not saying that my first was better than that- because it probably wasn't. But my first submitted flash probably was.
At 5/13/07 11:12 PM, TheHappySheep wrote: LOL @ everyone except BMK
oooh BMK just got shuuuuuned
At 5/13/07 11:18 PM, Ertyguy wrote:At 5/13/07 11:12 PM, TheHappySheep wrote: LOL @ everyone except BMKoooh BMK just got shuuuuuned
er...no. BMK is the only guy that noticed he's a alt, jamrock wannabe. Everyone else genuinely thinks he spent 3 hours making that piece and is suprised at it's blamming.
SO, I'm laughing at everyone for being naive.
At 4/21/07 02:16 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: and everyone heres the flash I made.
I slapped myself in the face when i saw that ... 3 hours for a ball moving in 5 keyframes and making boom... are you a sloth or something ?!
My first flash movie i´ve made came through and it people actually liked it ... BECAUSE I SPENT 3 WEEKS on it.
when u really get into flash 3 hours is like just drawing up the pictures, BG etc at the minimum.
At 4/20/07 10:54 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: Ok heres what happened: i submitted a flash of which was my first try.
Ok...
I said it in the description,
That's plain stupid, saying you're new doesn't make you immune from utter blammage.
I was completley dumbfounded
Don't be never think a 1st flash you pulled out of your ass to be uber-awesome and hit frontpage.
my great work (it took 3 hours) blamed!
Great work? If it takes 3 hours I dought its great. Good flashes take months to make!
I said in my flash it was my first and it's still here. Why? Because it took a month to make.
At 4/20/07 10:54 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: Ok heres what happened: i submitted a flash of which was my first try. I said it in the description, and it got blammed!! I was completley dumbfounded when i woke up one morning to find my great work (it took 3 hours) blamed! Why does this happen!?!? If you want to see the flash just ask me.
You answered your own question: Only 3 hours of work.
At 4/20/07 10:55 PM, WolfAkela wrote: Because it's crap. The "my first try" label isn't a blam-protector.
Neither is saying 'be gentle' or 'please dun blam'; practically anything which resembles something begging for sympathy. Same goes with messy spelling and representation in the Author Comments section.
In short; no pride, no save.
only 10 min of work http://denvish.net/ulf/130507/60027_mouse_gam e.php
My flash didnt get blammed because I worked on it.
It didnt get so many "good" reviews though and score was something like 2.5682 (or whateve with those last numbers).
But after that I worked on better storyline and animation...
It got decent score.
So... You should just work harder so people will vote better.
Remember that one movie.
By that one guy.
Anime+Fighting.
It was his first animation. Ever.
Won awards.
Won fans.
It was awesome.
Subway violence.
Then he asked Wade to delete it and asked his account to be deleted.
D:
Whatever happened to that guy.
Oh and hi Ozca/
if someone's first flash wasn't rubbish, then people would just think that the user stole it.
my first one didnt get blammed but i spent ages on it and even though i spent ages and it still wasnt great it was good for a first try even if your a great animator 3 hours is nothing so if its your first try and you work 3 hours its gonna be crap.
At 4/21/07 01:28 AM, Jectoons wrote:Well... my first two movies were blammed two... T-T
I really think of myself as a sucker after that (I have only submitted 3 movies... the third one is still in the "checking Room"). Bruh I try to submit movies but literally every single one has gotten blammed, I think my art style is crap, the only movie I have is 2 stars
At 6/22/21 05:08 PM, LiGamerGnarly65 wrote:At 4/21/07 01:28 AM, Jectoons wrote:Well... my first two movies were blammed two... T-T
I really think of myself as a sucker after that (I have only submitted 3 movies... the third one is still in the "checking Room"). Bruh I try to submit movies but literally every single one has gotten blammed, I think my art style is crap, the only movie I have is 2 stars
Why did you Necro a post from 2007? Some people have a tendency to react you know and boy would that be a disaster.
At 6/22/21 05:27 PM, Titilonic wrote:At 6/22/21 05:08 PM, LiGamerGnarly65 wrote:At 4/21/07 01:28 AM, Jectoons wrote:Well... my first two movies were blammed two... T-T
I really think of myself as a sucker after that (I have only submitted 3 movies... the third one is still in the "checking Room"). Bruh I try to submit movies but literally every single one has gotten blammed, I think my art style is crap, the only movie I have is 2 stars
Why did you Necro a post from 2007? Some people have a tendency to react you know and boy would that be a disaster.
What's with these necroed posts being empty but for the quote? It's as if they had nothing to say but went ahead and bumped it anyway
Edit: Shit, saw this was under "hot topic" and didn't see the last post was 5 days ago.
Slint approves of me! | "This is Newgrounds.com, not Disney.com" - WadeFulp
"Sit look rub panda" - Alan Davies
At 4/20/07 10:54 PM, Protosscat123 wrote:Ok heres what happened: i submitted a flash of which was my first try. I said it in the description, and it got blammed!! I was completley dumbfounded when i woke up one morning to find my great work (it took 3 hours) blamed! Why does this happen!?!? If you want to see the flash just ask me.
some level of quality control is present. Also, bad place, and bad time. Just work harder, and improve. Or make an animation about those darn blammers