At 1/15/08 08:00 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: the old submissions are a haven for abusive reviews, I wonder why

I don't think reviews written 2002 or before can be deleted.

he is right anything pre 2002 and anything of 2002 are considerd in the grandfather clause they cannot be dleated. PEROD. Now dont worry you wont get points off for flagging them.

As goes for ANY o the mods reviews they cant be deleated at all.

At 1/15/08 07:46 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

At 1/15/08 07:29 PM, FatKidWitAJetPak wrote: I went to silver to garbage...

Crap...

Damn dude that sucks. I've been trying to reverse your damage, but looks like my work still couldn't stop it from happening :/ Hopefully I can at least stop you from getting 20 feet deep into garbage >_<

had to bring Wade into this one to make sure I was doing the right thing ;P

You don't have to BLueHippo, but thanks a lot for your consideration. I still have deep deep garbage points now though... and I got it lower because I flagged apparent abusive ones AGAIN, that wern't abusive... I think my whistle has died now. 0_0

I was contacted about this "binary translator" review dilemma earlier today but wasn't able to make time to respond to it until now.

Since it seems to have been addressed already, just let me say this:

Punk-o-matic is the most reviewed submission of all time on Newgrounds, having received 12,899 reviews as of the time of this post. Most of them are song codes which were generated by the submission. They look like this:

-----------0-0-0---1--00----0--2-----
0---0-0-----0---100-200------0---0---
------------c---bbb-0-00--0--1---0---
6-0---2--7-0--0-0-0---000---0---0---c ---2---2-----4---4---b-a-----6-0---0-
0-1---000----0---22---0-0-----0-0---0 --0---0-------3-5-3-5-9-3-3-3-3--

The nature of these reviews obviously aren't too different from all the binary gibberish people were posting on the binary translator submission. So, barring some really petty arguments, what is truly different between the two? I don't seen 10,000+ punk-o-matic reviews flagged as abusive.

Well, many of them were random 0's and ones. I even checked.

At 1/15/08 10:09 PM, RageVI wrote: I was contacted about this "binary translator" review dilemma earlier today but wasn't able to make time to respond to it until now.

Since it seems to have been addressed already, just let me say this:

Punk-o-matic is the most reviewed submission of all time on Newgrounds, having received 12,899 reviews as of the time of this post. Most of them are song codes which were generated by the submission. They look like this:

-----------0-0-0---1--00----0--2-----
0---0-0-----0---100-200------0---0---
------------c---bbb-0-00--0--1---0---
6-0---2--7-0--0-0-0---000---0---0---c ---2---2-----4---4---b-a-----6-0---0-
0-1---000----0---22---0-0-----0-0---0 --0---0-------3-5-3-5-9-3-3-3-3--

The nature of these reviews obviously aren't too different from all the binary gibberish people were posting on the binary translator submission. So, barring some really petty arguments, what is truly different between the two? I don't seen 10,000+ punk-o-matic reviews flagged as abusive.

Well binary is an actual language where that just seems like the numbers they used to generate a song, not notes or chords mind you, just numbers used in a program to generate some random song. binary you can actually write senteces with, whereas that is just there code. Its not too different than other games where you can build your own level and then you paste it so others can see. thats why none of these are abusive. binary is a language and games like punk-o-matic are codes for the game that others can use, so its related to the game

At 1/15/08 09:38 PM, fuzzum111 wrote: he is right anything pre 2002 and anything of 2002 are considerd in the grandfather clause they cannot be dleated. PEROD. Now dont worry you wont get points off for flagging them.

As goes for ANY o the mods reviews they cant be deleated at all.

Well, only Admins can delete Mod reviews, and they usually aren't because Wade has much better things to do than keep the moderators from playing pranks. And if enough people whistle it, even older reviews can be deleted. It just takes a lot more whistles than on a more recent review.

Ah, FatKidWithAJetPack; unlucky...though if you had paid more attention to the warning I gave to you back on page 948 about the binary translator.......

At 1/15/08 09:38 PM, fuzzum111 wrote: he is right anything pre 2002 and anything of 2002 are considerd in the grandfather clause they cannot be dleated. PEROD. Now dont worry you wont get points off for flagging them.

As goes for ANY o the mods reviews they cant be deleated at all.

you can delete them. you just need enough whistle power (gold/diety) or enough flags that make it up.
http://cheekyvincent.newgrounds.com/news /post/24540
see section 3

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0372
TheFunk

Here you go.

http://scars29.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/responses
http://aliz.newgrounds.com/reviews/flash
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
112195
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /357302
http://phyko.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h
http://chubaka.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/7
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /156202
http://fizzo.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/7

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /420392 the one who voted 1 (Yea it's my video, but its abusive and no I didn't mark them myself bc it is my video)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /420390

At 1/16/08 12:45 AM, Pinoyguy75 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /420392 the one who voted 1 (Yea it's my video, but its abusive and no I didn't mark them myself bc it is my video)

Might as well go ahead and mark it too if you find it abusive.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /419675 - Billy-Bean's review.

http://flamewave.newgrounds.com/reviews/
he says that it's stolen

Here are few:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /86460/5/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /383947/1/score squidly's

,and so... goes terrybp, the alt, and his blatant whoring. get him!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0393 pepocho
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0387 wrath1998
http://pepocho.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/1 check out page 5 and 6 too
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0405 dafiss
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /160524/7 check back to page 5
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/35 9296 few here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /377547/75/score some here
http://deathworship666.newgrounds.com/re views/flash/1 and check page 3
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/34 1735 few here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /403825/3 check page 2 also
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/149133 /7/score and other page
ww.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/233937/
54/score and previous page
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /165362/99/score check back to page 78 21 pages of abuse

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923

So much good stuff here.

At 1/16/08 06:30 AM, firemario1 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923

So much good stuff here.

Whoops, broken link. Sorry 'bout that.

The real link.

At 1/16/08 06:30 AM, firemario1 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923

So much good stuff here.

The link is broken.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0415

stolen from

http://www.9mine.com/play/game_4693_Tank %20Attack.html

flag it!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923

Lots of here, questioning front page and not really reviewing the flash but the author group affliliation.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /420431 You will see :)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0434

Damnit, that flash was meant to get blammed, and those results permanently in the obituaries!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /124202
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /24812/7
http://xxnovaxx.newgrounds.com/reviews/a udio
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
45183
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
44549
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
44439
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /276946
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
43990

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /292989

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /301739/97/score

Some of them probably messed up.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0454

STOLEN from zone-archive

At 1/16/08 04:33 PM, DaVeB0T wrote:

At 1/16/08 09:27 AM, kidray76 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923

Lots of here, questioning front page and not really reviewing the flash but the author group affliliation.

still plenty there

Yeah, they keep coming. So check that submission as long as it is on front page.