http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /417887 - About 4 or 5 reviews saying that the flash is stolen.
Check page 2 as well.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /417887 - About 4 or 5 reviews saying that the flash is stolen.
Check page 2 as well.
Yay.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /125834/40
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2573/4
http://moemoney.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
http://mrmoneybags.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/responses
http://hypershadow2073.newgrounds.com/re views/flash
http://deimossaturn.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash/responses/3
http://soelammy.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
http://kahntahmp.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/responses
http://hungryzombie240.newgrounds.com/re views/flash/2
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /247892
http://jayfriend969.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash
The first review here: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/33 8311
At 1/17/08 10:36 PM, WadeFulp wrote: This topic is unlocked until the review mods can settle on guidelines for a new topic to follow.
THANKS WADE!
Also,
crazyman1487 He said he never finished playing the game and, in my opinion, he shouldn't review if he hadn't finished it.
|NG Is Dead|
Don't get soo happy, guys. They will lock this thread, but there will be a new one with decent rules.
Long time I don't post here since this thread lost its point. Whatever, here we go:
Ynek (Blam prediction)
EvilFlyingLemming
Koogan and dreamstohack
LibertyDeath and NereidAlbel
Reviews for: "This Girl"; Brain Dog: No Home; Mr. and Ms. Pacman
The top one
Learn the leasson, guys.
This quiz was made by adobe: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0683
At 1/18/08 05:42 AM, Phantox wrote:At 1/17/08 10:36 PM, WadeFulp wrote:crazyman1487 He said he never finished playing the game and, in my opinion, he shouldn't review if he hadn't finished it.
Ugh, benefit goes to reviewer on this one. If he said, he never played the game, then yes it would of been abusive. He said he couldn't finish the game, which entails he at least made an attempt to play it.
He also goes in to describe the flash, tell why for the low score, and even ways to improve.
Just because you don't finish a game, doesn't mean you can't leave a good review. Have you ever watched a movie just so boring, you either slept at one point or never bothered to finish? Same instance here.
So ... flags cleared.
I was told that Rage's thread was lock. That Greth-Of-Destruction sent me a PM about it.
At 1/18/08 10:57 AM, kidray76 wrote:At 1/18/08 05:42 AM, Phantox wrote:Ugh, benefit goes to reviewer on this one. If he said, he never played the game, then yes it would of been abusive. He said he couldn't finish the game, which entails he at least made an attempt to play it.At 1/17/08 10:36 PM, WadeFulp wrote:crazyman1487 He said he never finished playing the game and, in my opinion, he shouldn't review if he hadn't finished it.
He also goes in to describe the flash, tell why for the low score, and even ways to improve.
Just because you don't finish a game, doesn't mean you can't leave a good review. Have you ever watched a movie just so boring, you either slept at one point or never bothered to finish? Same instance here.
So ... flags cleared.
I think you guys should look into this tho. If a person can't finish watching the movie or finish playing the game, they shouldn't leave a review because they might have missed something important. (Like better graphics or anything like that) Still, I'll remember this next time.
|NG Is Dead|
At 1/18/08 11:26 AM, Mechabloby wrote: I was told that Rage's thread was lock. That Greth-Of-Destruction sent me a PM about it.
It WAS, I haven't gotten around to sending all the PMs to everyone saying that it now is UNlocked.
At 1/18/08 12:41 PM, SirStanley wrote: http://cyber-asbinio.newgrounds.com/revi ews/audio/2
At 1/18/08 12:41 PM, SirStanley wrote: http://cyber-asbinio.newgrounds.com/revi ews/audio/2
Don't forget page one. There are a lot of abuusive reviews here saying that the flash is stolen.
At 1/18/08 12:59 PM, Greth-of-destruction wrote:At 1/18/08 12:41 PM, SirStanley wrote: http://cyber-asbinio.newgrounds.com/revi ews/audio/2Don't forget page one. There are a lot of abuusive reviews here saying that the flash is stolen.
I've already said it. Mehehe
Thanks to www.google.com
Here's my load...
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/98901/
12
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/47/7/s core
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/16668
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/167072 /5
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/297198 /5
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/18023
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/99931/
11/score
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/285815 /2
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/2581
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/280866 /9
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/28263
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/220462
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/205526
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/408167 /4
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/109449
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/41093
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/89807/
3
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/282517 /5
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/331898
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/418370 /2
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/43609/
5
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/43609/
5
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/26282
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/24923
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/158374
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/216605 /2
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/308479
Thanks to:
http://www.google.com/searchq=you+suck+b lam+site:www.newgrounds.com/portal/revie ws&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&start=0&sa=N
Seriously there are millions there....
At 1/18/08 02:41 PM, yoshi77777 wrote: Thanks to www.google.com
Here's my load...
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/98901/
12
www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews/47/7/s core
The baby killing flash should also be PMed to Wade about, as well as flagging the reviews. It may be one ancient Flash...but it DOES link to a site without prompting!! (or does it?...wait...)
At 1/17/08 11:09 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: I think what captainbob was getting at is the fact that the gray area seems to be increasing since there are more and more users searching for abusive reviews, and some people call some things abusive just to get their stats high; which results in negative whistle points.
That pretty much sums it up for me. I keep seeing more and more reviews with a lot of flags on them that shouldn't have been flagged in the first place while moderating reviews. It's hard to judge whether to clear the flags with a penalty or not because of that. There are simply too many people looking to get ZOMG DIETY any way they can...look at a few weeks ago, where we had accounts created just to spam negative reviews so the main account could flag them for whistle points. Of course, something like that is easily caught by us review mods, but still, it is a sign of increasing malicious intent toward the whistle system.
At 1/18/08 03:53 PM, DaVeB0T wrote: Plus if you dont want to spend the time looking for the reviews, then you shouldnt be flagging reviews at all.
I completely disagree with this point. I think the way in which links have been posted in here lately is frankly ridiculous and extremely whistle-whorish (namely, posts with a LOT of links).
This thread should never have been about going out of your way to find abusive reviews, but moreover to post abuse that you stumbled upon. I think the way that some users are spending ages actively searching for abuse is frankly ridiculous - using Google searches and the like. This kind of behavior leads to stupid overzealous flagging, which in turn leads to users doing stupid things like creating spam alts to increase their whistle levels. It's a snowball effect which will inevitably end up with this thread causing more problems than it solves.
What the users who post links in this thread need to realize is that the whistle system was implemented to help clear the site of abuse, with a whistle level as a bonus, not the other way around.
At 1/18/08 04:29 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: There isn't much the staff can do about spam alts and stat whores flagging just for the sake of getting a shiny virtual whistle. For instance, I know for a fact people blindly flagged everything abusive on the SSBB submission that was on the front page.
No kidding...I just cleared a LOT of flags from reviews on that submission. Any thing on the front page is a lightning rod for abusive reviews and abusive flaggers.
I'm glad that the thread is back now, I think that it should stay here. At LEAST until a new, official thread is made. It's an efficient way of removing spam and abuse that otherwise wouldn't be flagged by multiple people.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 0679 - mcinus
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/13 0901 - hamz10, Worldclock
All I could find :(
.
http://teddyrob.newgrounds.com/reviews/a udio
http://xnightmarex1.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash/3
http://blind2k5.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
http://rouge-block.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/3
http://bladesweep.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /99117/33
http://youkilledmygoat.newgrounds.com/re views/
http://gyromite.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash