nice video.
I watch them all, yet everysingle one of the, and they were all GRREEAATTT(OMG TONY TEH TIGER). Yea...
The onlything that would make it better is add a Play all button that plays all the videos continuously.
Wish there were more flash artists like you at NG. Keep up the good work.
Ok
Let me clear up most of this mumbo jumbo Bullshit-- Weed does not lead to lung cancer.
Marijuana smoking does not increase a person's risk of developing lung cancer, according to the findings of a new study at the University of California Los Angeles that surprised even the researchers.
They had expected to find that a history of heavy marijuana use, like cigarette smoking, would increase the risk of cancer.
Instead, the study, which compared the lifestyles of 611 Los Angeles County lung cancer patients and 601 patients with head and neck cancers with those of 1,040 people without cancer, found no elevated cancer risk for even the heaviest pot smokers. It did find a 20-fold increased risk of lung cancer in people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.
The study results were presented in San Diego on Tuesday at a meeting of the American Thoracic Society.
The study was confined to people under age 60 since baby boomers were the most likely age group to have long-term exposure to marijuana, said Dr. Donald Tashkin, senior researcher and professor at the UCLA School of Medicine.
The results should not be taken as a blank check to smoke pot, which has been associated with problems like cognitive impairment and chronic bronchitis, said Dr. John Hansen-Flaschen, chief of pulmonary and critical care at the University of Pennsylvania Health System in Philadelphia. He was not involved in the study.
Previous studies showed marijuana tar contained about 50 percent more of the chemicals linked to lung cancer, compared with tobacco tar, Tashkin said. In addition, smoking a marijuana joint deposits four times more tar in the lungs than smoking an equivalent amount of tobacco.
"Marijuana is packed more loosely than tobacco, so there's less filtration through the rod of the cigarette, so more particles will be inhaled," Tashkin said in a statement. "And marijuana smokers typically smoke differently than tobacco smokers -- they hold their breath about four times longer, allowing more time for extra fine particles to deposit in the lung."
He theorized that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, a chemical in marijuana smoke that produces its psychotropic effect, may encourage aging, damaged cells to die off before they become cancerous.
Hansen-Flaschen also cautioned a cancer-marijuana link could emerge as baby boomers age and there may be smaller population groups, based on genetics or other factors, still at risk for marijuana-related cancers.
Ok?
you dumbasses
ok so a lot of people reviewing are kinda stupid so let me clear it up.
weed=harmless smoke= :( weed=depresant
depresant= makes you tired weed= gateway drug
reson for that= weed harmless comercials exagerating, people try weed, relize the bull shit, come to think that other drugs are ok to
most over the counter and prescription medicine is worse than weed.
being pro weed doesnt make you a hippie
NICE DUDE
Really politicaly correct. Even regan cant disagree HAHAHAHAHA. Im a chron smoker meself and that was real nice anims and info. hahahah SLOW MO. And its all true folks its slo mo BIOTCH.
Once again it is funny because it is true.
The hot soup in the fae is a very god metaphor for the difficulty I have, talking with people about marijuana.