At 6/24/22 08:09 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 6/24/22 07:27 PM, Dolorious wrote: I wonder when a bunch high quality bricks will mysteriously start appearing everywhere for the useful idiots? As nice as it is to see all the people mad at not being able to kill children. I have a feeling the very possible violent outrage is exactly what they want. But for what political purpose it's moving towards is a mystery to me. Well I guess the ulterior motive will reveal itself as this progresses. In the short term I'll just be here watching as this hilarious outrage roars.

Edit: I'm sure it'll be a fiery but peaceful protest XD

Yes, yes, people are agaisnt free speech when you say they are, support pedophilism when you say they are, are child murders when you say they are.... While looking the other way, and making excises when it comes from your side. You really need to get off your ivory tower with all your absolutism, and virtual signaling.

At 6/25/22 12:07 AM, Dolorious wrote:

At 6/24/22 08:09 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 6/24/22 07:27 PM, Dolorious wrote: I wonder when a bunch high quality bricks will mysteriously start appearing everywhere for the useful idiots? As nice as it is to see all the people mad at not being able to kill children. I have a feeling the very possible violent outrage is exactly what they want. But for what political purpose it's moving towards is a mystery to me. Well I guess the ulterior motive will reveal itself as this progresses. In the short term I'll just be here watching as this hilarious outrage roars.

Edit: I'm sure it'll be a fiery but peaceful protest XD

Yes, yes, people are agaisnt free speech when you say they are, support pedophilism when you say they are, are child murders when you say they are.... While looking the other way, and making excises when it comes from your side. You really need to get off your ivory tower with all your absolutism, and virtual signaling.

Absolutism, fascinating that you use that term.
Who do I want absolute power invested in exactly Edy? I'm curious to see if you're answer will even be anywhere remotely close.
More importantly what side am I looking away and making excuses for specifically?

At 6/25/22 12:20 AM, EdyKel wrote:

At 6/25/22 12:07 AM, Dolorious wrote:

At 6/24/22 08:09 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 6/24/22 07:27 PM, Dolorious wrote: I wonder when a bunch high quality bricks will mysteriously start appearing everywhere for the useful idiots? As nice as it is to see all the people mad at not being able to kill children. I have a feeling the very possible violent outrage is exactly what they want. But for what political purpose it's moving towards is a mystery to me. Well I guess the ulterior motive will reveal itself as this progresses. In the short term I'll just be here watching as this hilarious outrage roars.

Edit: I'm sure it'll be a fiery but peaceful protest XD

Yes, yes, people are agaisnt free speech when you say they are, support pedophilism when you say they are, are child murders when you say they are.... While looking the other way, and making excises when it comes from your side. You really need to get off your ivory tower with all your absolutism, and virtual signaling.

Absolutism, fascinating that you use that term.
Who do I want absolute power invested in exactly Edy? I'm curious to see if you're answer will even be anywhere remotely close.
More importantly what side am I looking away and making excuses for specifically?

Then stop misusing words like pedophilism, murder, and other absolutes, when posting your arguments around here. And your views are often centered on criticizing the left, while constantly ignoring in your face shit from the right or from your own group.

Telling people that they want to murder kids over their abortion views is an absolute, stupid, and extreme.

At 6/24/22 10:40 PM, Aaron-Chandler wrote:
But that doesn't change the fact that the decision to get an abortion is the decision to willfully deprive a human life of the opportunity to exist at all. This is not a simple thing. It does effect more people than the mother. And it isn't just your child.

At 6/25/22 09:47 AM, Zachary wrote:

At 6/25/22 07:32 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: Didn't even take a day and the serious violence from the pro abortion side has already begun. Some dude tried to run over a couple of pro life women in GA.

"Iowa is one of three states, along with Oklahoma and Florida, to enact laws this year giving drivers some degree of legal immunity if they use their vehicles to hurt protesters, part of a wave of “hit and kill” bills introduced in 13 other states by Republican legislators since 2017."

Oops.

At 6/25/22 11:06 AM, awdgamer123 wrote: I usually tend to stay out of this stuff (I must admit that I'm not too well versed in politics) but I don't see why people are getting so butthurt over this? Doesn't this mean that it's the state's choice now? Some states can ban abortions, but others don't have to or the Governor and State Reps can even be pressured into implementing the kind of abortions you want. Like if you live in Connecticut, literally nothing is gonna change as far as abortions are concerned.

At 6/25/22 01:24 AM, Gario wrote:

At 6/24/22 10:40 PM, Aaron-Chandler wrote:
But that doesn't change the fact that the decision to get an abortion is the decision to willfully deprive a human life of the opportunity to exist at all. This is not a simple thing. It does effect more people than the mother. And it isn't just your child.

wait, you think this is specifically about abortion?

how silly, SCOTUS ruled nothing on abortion

what they ruled was that the states must have the right to write and enforce laws that act on people's personal lives and choices

abortion is of course affected, but this ruling also removes protections for gay marriage, contraception, sodomy (anal and blowjobs), porn, masturbation, interracial marriage...

buddy, the whole lid is blown wide open, there is no legal precedent protecting any of this from states enacting laws against them

i don't like abortions either, but this nuked everything to take it down, and you're gonna experience the repercussions of it years to come

You're talking as though America is gonna go back to the 40s or something. You do realize that it's been illegal to discriminate based on race ever since the Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, don't you? As for the other stuff, it's highly unlikely stuff like gay marriage and contraception will get banned due to the amount of pushback it'll cause and even if they did, like I said before, you can just move to a state that does allow them.

At 6/25/22 11:06 AM, awdgamer123 wrote: I usually tend to stay out of this stuff (I must admit that I'm not too well versed in politics) but I don't see why people are getting so butthurt over this? Doesn't this mean that it's the state's choice now? Some states can ban abortions, but others don't have to or better yet (for you), the Governor and State Reps can even be pressured into implementing the kind of unrestricted abortions you want. Like if you live in Connecticut, literally nothing is gonna change as far as abortions are concerned.

At 6/25/22 01:24 AM, Gario wrote:

At 6/24/22 10:40 PM, Aaron-Chandler wrote:
But that doesn't change the fact that the decision to get an abortion is the decision to willfully deprive a human life of the opportunity to exist at all. This is not a simple thing. It does effect more people than the mother. And it isn't just your child.

wait, you think this is specifically about abortion?

how silly, SCOTUS ruled nothing on abortion

what they ruled was that the states must have the right to write and enforce laws that act on people's personal lives and choices

abortion is of course affected, but this ruling also removes protections for gay marriage, contraception, sodomy (anal and blowjobs), porn, masturbation, interracial marriage...

buddy, the whole lid is blown wide open, there is no legal precedent protecting any of this from states enacting laws against them

i don't like abortions either, but this nuked everything to take it down, and you're gonna experience the repercussions of it years to come

You're talking as though America is gonna go back to the 40s or something. You do realize that it's been illegal to discriminate based on race ever since the Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, don't you? As for the other stuff, it's highly unlikely stuff like gay marriage and contraception will get banned due to the amount of pushback it'll cause and even if they did, like I said before, you can just move to a state that does allow them.

At 6/25/22 11:22 AM, EnterTheTwilitRealm wrote: We're "butthurt" over this because, among a multitude of other reasons, the people who'll need abortions (rape victims, those who might die from complications from pregnancy, those carrying a fetus expected to have a poor quality of life or outright die, those who do not have the financial resources to have and/or raise a child etc.) could very well lose their ability to get one in many states (which is now happening as we speak), and because of this and the possibility that some may need to travel across many states for an abortion (which some may not be able to afford), more and more people will likely turn to more dangerous abortion procedures that can put the life and wellbeing of people who undergo them at risk.

At 6/25/22 10:44 AM, EnterTheTwilitRealm wrote:

At 6/25/22 07:32 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: Didn't even take a day and the serious violence from the pro abortion side has already begun. Some dude tried to run over a couple of pro life women in GA.

> claims that pro-life protestors got run over in Georgia
> Tweet linked to along with other Tweets reporting on this says that the protestors were pro-choice and this took place in Iowa

Nice try at spreading misinformation, kid.

At 6/25/22 11:06 AM, awdgamer123 wrote: I usually tend to stay out of this stuff (I must admit that I'm not too well versed in politics) but I don't see why people are getting so butthurt over this? Doesn't this mean that it's the state's choice now? Some states can ban abortions, but others don't have to or better yet (for you), the Governor and State Reps can even be pressured into implementing the kind of unrestricted abortions you want. Like if you live in Connecticut, literally nothing is gonna change as far as abortions are concerned.

At 6/25/22 01:05 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:

At 6/25/22 09:47 AM, Zachary wrote:

At 6/25/22 07:32 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: Didn't even take a day and the serious violence from the pro abortion side has already begun. Some dude tried to run over a couple of pro life women in GA.

Oops.

Always interesting to hear how self-defense works from the Anti-Rittenhouse brigade.

Are you ever gonna mention the fact that witnesses and the media claim he was intentionally trying to run over protesters and moved around several cars to do so? It is the exact opposite of the picture you try to paint.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/truck-driver-rams-into-protesters-roe-demonstration-in-iowa_n_62b66490e4b0cdccbe6b9399

The incident went exactly as I described it and they were not pro choice protesters, lol. I grant that I made a mistake on the location but that is literally it. But knowing how your type works I imagine you will forever believe the nonsense you are saying.

At 6/25/22 01:09 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:

At 6/25/22 10:44 AM, EnterTheTwilitRealm wrote:

At 6/25/22 07:32 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: Didn't even take a day and the serious violence from the pro abortion side has already begun. Some dude tried to run over a couple of pro life women in GA.

> claims that pro-life protestors got run over in Georgia
> Tweet linked to along with other Tweets reporting on this says that the protestors were pro-choice and this took place in Iowa

Nice try at spreading misinformation, kid.

The incident went exactly as I described it and they were not pro choice protesters, lol. I grant that I made a mistake on the location but that is literally it. But knowing how your type works I imagine you will forever believe the nonsense you are saying.

At 6/25/22 01:05 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:
Are you ever gonna mention the fact that witnesses and the media claim he was intentionally trying to run over protesters and moved around several cars to do so? It is the exact opposite of the picture you try to paint.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/truck-driver-rams-into-protesters-roe-demonstration-in-iowa_n_62b66490e4b0cdccbe6b9399

At 6/25/22 01:05 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:

At 6/25/22 09:47 AM, Zachary wrote:

At 6/25/22 07:32 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: Didn't even take a day and the serious violence from the pro abortion side has already begun. Some dude tried to run over a couple of pro life women in GA.

Oops.

Always interesting to hear how self-defense works from the Anti-Rittenhouse brigade.

Are you ever gonna mention the fact that witnesses and the media claim he was intentionally trying to run over protesters and moved around several cars to do so? It is the exact opposite of the picture you try to paint.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/truck-driver-rams-into-protesters-roe-demonstration-in-iowa_n_62b66490e4b0cdccbe6b9399

At 6/25/22 02:08 PM, Gario wrote:

At 6/25/22 01:39 PM, BUM-DRILLER wrote:
if I may be so bold, I think the future implications of America, population 400,000,000+ would be more informative and interesting to our lurkers.

neat

it's not like it's a common theme of fascists to want to radically increase a nation's birthrate to achieve whatever ends they have

At 6/25/22 02:08 PM, Gario wrote:

At 6/25/22 01:39 PM, BUM-DRILLER wrote:
if I may be so bold, I think the future implications of America, population 400,000,000+ would be more informative and interesting to our lurkers.

neat

it's not like it's a common theme of fascists to want to radically increase a nation's birthrate to achieve whatever ends they have